και οι φαρισαιοι 96.6% ¦ των φαρισαιων CT 0.2%
However, the length of the variant unit in Text und Textwert is actually as follows:
αυτω και οι γραμματεις και οι φαρισαιοι ¦ αυτω και οι γραμματεις των φαρισαιων
This difference is due to the fact that some manuscripts have further variations that are not included in the main text of any of the editions of the Greek New Testament compared in the footnotes presented in this volume. Nevertheless, the percentages listed in the footnotes correspond to the variant units as they are presented in Text und Textwert because it provides a truer picture of the manuscript evidence as a whole.
The same sort of rule applies for Wasserman's collation of Jude, Solomon's collation of Philemon, and Morrill's collation of John 18. For John 7:53–8:11 and the Revelation variant units calculated from the Editio Critica Maior and Hoskier, the length of the variant unit generally matches the length of that particular variant unit as listed in the footnotes of this edition. Corrections and additions by later scribes are counted in addition to the original reading of a manuscript. Thus, a single manuscript can be counted more than once.†Percentages calculated from Tommy Wasserman's collation of Jude are based on Joey McCollum's tabulations, which take into account only the original text for each manuscript. Percentages calculated from Maurice Robinson's collation of John 7:53–8:11 take into account only the original text for each manuscript. In the same way, percentages calculated from the combined collations of the Editio Critica Maior and Hoskier take into account only the original text for each continuous text manuscript (ignoring lectionary manuscripts). The effect of this different calculation method on the overall percentages is extremely minimal. Apart from this difference, the percentages are calculated in much the same way as the percentages based on the Text und Textwert volumes. Consequently, it is more accurate to speak of the percentage of manuscript readings than the percentage of manuscripts. When Text und Textwert groups alternate spellings under one variant, they are counted as one variant in the calculation of manuscript percentages in this volume. Similarly, when Text und Textwert groups alternate spellings under separate variants, they are counted as separate variants in the calculation of manuscript percentages in this volume.‡In Revelation minor spelling differences are usually not counted as separate variants. This is in accordance with the presentation of the data in the Revelation volume of the Editio Critica Maior. In Revelation, the difference between numbers represented by words (for example, τεταρτου) and numbers represented by letters (for example, Δ) is usually ignored unless it is the primary difference under consideration for the variant unit. Finally, manuscripts that have long omissions due to factors such as homoioteleuton are included in the total number when calculating percentages.§The one exception is John 7:53–8:11. For this passage only the manuscripts that contain the passage are considered in calculating percentages.
| Reading | Text | Subtotal |
| 1 | του χριστου (‘of Christ’) | 458 |
| 2 | — | 23 |
| 3 | του θεου (‘of God’) | 1 |
| 4 | του κυριου (‘of the Lord’) | 1 |
| U1 | long omission (homoioteleuton) | 4 |
| U2 | long omission (homoioteleuton) | 25 |
| V | long omission (other) | 1 |
| X | illegible | 3 |
| Y | film error | 1 |
| Z | lacuna | 52 |
| Reading | Percentage |
| 1 | 89.3% (458/513) |
| 2 | 4.5% (23/513) |
| 3 | 0.2% (1/513) |
| 4 | 0.2% (1/513) |
| U1 | 0.8% (4/513) |
| U2 | 4.9% (25/513) |
| V | 0.2% (1/513) |
| Reading | Text | Subtotal |
| 1 | το μαρτυριον του θεου (‘the testimony of God’) | 556 |
| 1B | το μαρτυριον θεου (‘the testimony of God’) | 2 |
| 2 | το μυστηριον του θεου (‘the mystery of God’) | 26 |
| 3 | το μαρτυριον του θεου {υμιν} (‘the testimony of God’ but placed before the words ‘to you’) | 1 |
| 4 | το μαρτυριον του ιησου (‘the testimony of Jesus’) | 1 |
| 5 | το μαρτυριον του χριστου (‘the testimony of Christ’) | 3 |
| 6 | το σωτηριον του θεου (‘the salvation of God’) | 1 |
| 7 | το ευαγγελιον του θεου (‘the good news of God’) | 6 |
| U | long omission (homoioteleuton) | 1 |
| W | uncertain as to whether it is Reading 1, Reading 2, or Reading 6 | 1 |
| X | illegible | 3 |
| Z | lacuna | 145 |
| Reading | Percentage |
| 1 | 93.1% (556/597) |
| 1B | 0.3% (2/597) |
| 2 | 4.4% (26/597) |
| 3 | 0.2% (1/597) |
| 4 | 0.2% (1/597) |
| 5 | 0.5% (3/597) |
| 6 | 0.2% (1/597) |
| 7 | 1% (6/597) |
| U | 0.2% (1/597) |
| Reading | Text | Subtotal |
| 1 | ο αληθινος | 1,333 |
| 1-f | ο αληθος | no subtotal |
| 1C | ο αληθης | 1 |
| Reading | Text | Subtotal |
| 1 | ο αληθινος | 1,332 |
| 1-f | ο αληθος | 1 |
| 1C | ο αληθης | 1 |
| 13 OM. των λογων τουτων |
| 030* 106 164 494 516* 1349* 1356 1474 2649* |
| ANZAHL DER ZEUGEN:†That is, “NUMBER OF WITNESSES.” 9 |
| 14-f των οχλων λογων |
| 335 |
| Matt. 1:11 | 86.9% |
| Matt. 1:16 | 97.5% |
| Matt. 1:25(1) | 99.5% |
| Matt. 3:12 | 75.6% |
| Matt. 5:4–5 | 98.3% |
| Matt. 7:21 | 99.1% |
| Matt. 12:2 | 97.0% |
| Matt. 14:3 | 98.8% |
| Mark 1:6 | 99.6% |
| Mark 1:7 | 97.4% |
| Mark 1:11 | 98.2% |
| Mark 1:15 | 79.3% |
| Mark 1:25(1) | 99.5% |
| Mark 1:25(2) | 88.5% |
| Mark 1:35 | 70.3% |
| Mark 1:45 | 99.2% |
| Mark 2:26(1) | 99.8% |
| Mark 3:5 | 99.1% |
| Mark 3:18 | 99.2% |
| Mark 3:21(1) | 96.3% |
| Mark 3:21(2) | 94.7% |
| Mark 4:6 | 98.4% |
| Mark 5:21(1) | 95.3% |
| Mark 5:21(2) | 96.6% |
| Mark 5:22 | 98.1% |
| Mark 5:33 | 98.3% |
| Mark 6:2(1) | 98.8% |
| Mark 6:14(2) | 91.9% |
| Mark 6:44 | 97.6% |
| Mark 6:47 | 98.7% |
| Mark 6:50 | 94.2% |
| Mark 7:13 | 99.0% |
| Mark 7:33 | 91.5% |
| Mark 7:35 | 99.0% |
| Mark 8:10(1) | 97.9% |
| Mark 8:10(2) | 96.0% |
| Mark 8:15(1) | 94.5% |
| Mark 8:15(2) | 96.7% |
| Mark 8:35(2) | 98.8% |
| Mark 9:25 | 98.9% |
| Mark 9:34 | 92.1% |
| Mark 9:35 | 76.1% |
| Mark 10:19(2) | 84.1% |
| Mark 10:19(3) | 87.7% |
| Mark 10:43(2) | 93.8% |
| Mark 12:14(2) | 94.5% |
| Mark 12:41 | 88.5% |
| Mark 13:2(2) | 97.9% |
| Mark 14:25 | 96.3% |
| Mark 15:12 | 96.6% |
| Mark 16:1–20 | 99.8% |
| Mark 16:14(2) | 99.8% |
| Luke 19:25 | 93.8% |
| Luke 22:43–44 | 98.7% |
| Luke 23:34 | 89.3% |
| John 1:4 | 99.7% |
| John 1:27(3) | 90.5% |
| John 1:36 | 97.7% |
| John 2:15(1) | 82.3% |
| John 3:5(2) | 98.9% |
| John 3:20 | 82.1% |
| John 3:27(2) | 97.7% |
| John 3:31 | 96.8% |
| John 3:32 | 96.8% |
| John 4:1(2) | 94.9% |
| John 4:9 | 86.6% |
| John 4:11(2) | 97.2% |
| John 4:23 | 91.2% |
| John 4:24 | 94.2% |
| John 4:53 | 90.2% |
| John 5:7 | 98.8% |
| John 5:25 | 93.1% |
| John 5:39 | 92.2% |
| John 5:44(2) | 97.7% |
| John 6:1 | 90.4% |
| John 6:4 | 99.8% |
| John 6:10 | 83.3% |
| John 6:11 | 83.4% |
| John 6:14(2) | 98.1% |
| John 6:21 | 93.4% |
| John 6:23(2) | 91.5% |
| John 6:42(1) | 99.5% |
| John 6:46 | 96.3% |
| John 6:52 | 84.2% |
| John 6:56 | 99.8% |
| John 6:64 | 92.0% |
| John 7:4 | 97.0% |
| John 7:47(1) | 94.8% |
| John 7:47(2) | 97.4% |
| John 8:14 | 97.1% |
| John 8:16(2) | 99.2% |
| John 8:25(1) | 97.3% |
| John 8:25(2) | 98.1% |
| John 8:34 | 99.0% |
| John 8:38(3) | 97.4% |
| John 8:38(6) | 98.8% |
| John 8:46 | 97.2% |
| John 8:57 | 98.5% |
| John 9:4(2) | 99.3% |
| John 9:18 | 96.4% |
| John 9:33 | 95.4% |
| John 9:38–39a | 99.8% |
| John 10:15 | 99.1% |
| John 10:16(1) | 61.0% |
| John 10:34(1) | 99.0% |
| John 10:34(2) | 98.7% |
| John 10:36 | 93.6% |
| John 10:40(1) | 89.4% |
| John 10:40(2) | 93.2% |
| John 10:41 | 87.5% |
| Acts 2:43–44 | 87.3% |
| Acts 2:46 | 78.0% |
| Acts 5:21 | 96.3% |
| Acts 8:39 | 92.6% |
| Acts 12:3 | 98.5% |
| Acts 13:33(2) | 99.8% |
| Acts 15:2 | 94.8% |
| Acts 16:35 | 95.4% |
| Acts 18:27 | 76.1% |
| Acts 20:32 | 98.5% |
| Acts 23:25(1) | 98.6% |
| Acts 23:25(2) | 97.9% |
| Rom. 3:12 | 99.0% |
| Rom. 5:2 | 95.1% |
| Rom. 5:8 | 90.7% |
| Rom. 8:23(2) | 97.7% |
| Rom. 13:1 | 91.5% |
| Rom. 14:19 | 97.2% |
| Rom. 15:13 | 90.8% |
| Rom. 16:3 | 99.2% |
| Rom. 16:4–5 | 94.9% |
| Rom. 16:7 | 98.3% |
| Rom. 16:21 | 99.5% |
| Rom. 16:27 | 95.3% |
| 1 Cor. 1:8(1) | 95.2% |
| 1 Cor. 1:8(2) | 95.7% |
| 1 Cor. 5:6 | 97.5% |
| 1 Cor. 9:16 | 98.8% |
| 1 Cor. 10:17 | 96.4% |
| 1 Cor. 14:34–35 | 95.0% |
| 1 Cor. 15:5 | 96.3% |
| 1 Cor. 15:10 | 94.6% |
| 1 Cor. 15:15 | 93.8% |
| 1 Cor. 16:19 | 99.2% |
| 2 Cor. 2:3 | 89.4% |
| 2 Cor. 4:17 | 96.9% |
| 2 Cor. 12:7 | 92.1% |
| Gal. 1:15 | 89.7% |
| Gal. 3:14 | 97.5% |
| Gal. 4:17 | 85.0% |
| Eph. 1:1 | 96.0% |
| Eph. 6:19 | 99.3% |
| Phil. 1:3 | 97.2% |
| Phil. 1:11(2) | 96.7% |
| Phil. 3:12 | 98.8% |
| Col. 3:21 | 78.5% |
| 2 Thess. 3:4 | 79.5% |
| Heb. 7:1 | 96.7% |
| Heb. 13:21(2) | 96.3% |
| James 1:17 | 94.5% |
| James 4:9 | 91.9% |
| 1 John 2:10 | 93.7% |
| 1 John 5:6 | 75.4% |
| Jude 1:1 | 93.3% |
| Rev. 13:2 | 71.7% |
| Rev. 18:22 | 84.1% |
*^ It should be noted that the length of any given variant unit in Text und Textwert may sometimes be longer than what is cited in the footnotes of The Text-Critical Greek New Testament. For example, the first variant in Mark 2:16 reads as follows:και οι φαρισαιοι 96.6% ¦ των φαρισαιων CT 0.2%However, the length of the variant unit in Text und Textwert is actually as follows: αυτω και οι γραμματεις και οι φαρισαιοι ¦ αυτω και οι γραμματεις των φαρισαιωνThis difference is due to the fact that some manuscripts have further variations that are not included in the main text of any of the editions of the Greek New Testament compared in the footnotes presented in this volume. Nevertheless, the percentages listed in the footnotes correspond to the variant units as they are presented in Text und Textwert because it provides a truer picture of the manuscript evidence as a whole. The same sort of rule applies for Wasserman's collation of Jude, Solomon's collation of Philemon, and Morrill's collation of John 18. For John 7:53–8:11 and the Revelation variant units calculated from the Editio Critica Maior and Hoskier, the length of the variant unit generally matches the length of that particular variant unit as listed in the footnotes of this edition.
†^ Percentages calculated from Tommy Wasserman's collation of Jude are based on Joey McCollum's tabulations, which take into account only the original text for each manuscript. Percentages calculated from Maurice Robinson's collation of John 7:53–8:11 take into account only the original text for each manuscript. In the same way, percentages calculated from the combined collations of the Editio Critica Maior and Hoskier take into account only the original text for each continuous text manuscript (ignoring lectionary manuscripts). The effect of this different calculation method on the overall percentages is extremely minimal. Apart from this difference, the percentages are calculated in much the same way as the percentages based on the Text und Textwert volumes.
‡^ In Revelation minor spelling differences are usually not counted as separate variants. This is in accordance with the presentation of the data in the Revelation volume of the Editio Critica Maior. In Revelation, the difference between numbers represented by words (for example, τεταρτου) and numbers represented by letters (for example, Δ) is usually ignored unless it is the primary difference under consideration for the variant unit.
§^ The one exception is John 7:53–8:11. For this passage only the manuscripts that contain the passage are considered in calculating percentages.
*^ Two exceptions are 1 Cor. 14:24 and 2 Cor. 11:3 in which the percentage for Reading 1B is combined with the percentage for Reading 1 since the only difference is the inclusion or exclusion of sigma for the word ουτω(ς). Other exceptions are Mark 16:9–20, John 5:4, John 7:53–8:11, Romans 14:24–26, and Romans 16:25–27 in which the totals from different readings are combined because the differences in the readings are based upon the presence or absence of asterisks or obeli in the margin and other similar notations or distinctions.
†^ That is, “NUMBER OF WITNESSES.”
‡^ It should be noted, however, that the collations for five variant sets (Mark 2:14; 12:25; Acts 2:7; 18:21; 27:5) are unreliable, with many manuscripts classified incorrectly.